Uncategorized

The Valentine’s Day Survival Guide [Video]

Monday, February 14th, 2011

The Valentine's Day Survival GuideValentine’s Day can be a wonderful time to celebrate love; it can also be a hellish disaster waiting to happen. Here’s how to hack Valentine’s Day to make it a night you’ll actually want to remember—whether you’ve got someone to spend it with or not.

Note: We know some of you feel Valentine’s Day is a crappy, commercialized, load of BS—and that’s totally fine. While this guide is geared towards surviving V-Day, it’s not about following the traditional path. It’s also applicable to your next big date and a look at how to handle being alone. We don’t dive into the subject of love too often here on Lifehacker, but today we’re here to help you out regardless of what your romantic situation may be.

I’ve had just about every Valentine’s Day experience you can imagine: I’ve been broken up with, had a first date, gotten sick, visited places you wouldn’t speak of in polite company, and even had a great evening of romance. While Valentine’s Day can be a lot of fun, it’s prone to disaster. A lot of that potential disaster can easily be avoided, however, by just managing your expectations, preparing for problems, and planning your day a little differently.


Couples

Valentine’s Day can be enjoyed by anyone under the right pretext, but it was designed for people in relationships. If you’ve been lucky enough to find yourself in love this Valentine’s Day, here are some tips, tricks, and suggestions to help you make sure you don’t screw it up.

Don’t Expect Romance After Dinner

The Valentine's Day Survival GuideThe traditional Valentine’s Day date generally consists of a nice, romantic date…and then falling into a food coma the minute you get home. There’s nothing wrong with having a really nice, delicious, fatty meal on rare, special occasions, but when that meal forces you into unconsciousness before your evening is officially over you might want to reconsider your plans. Sex advice columnist Dan Savage repeatedly recommends—even cautions—couples to save the food for last. If you’re planning on eating a big, heavy meal for your romantic night out, you ought to take care of the romance, sex, or whatever else you plan to do beforehand.

Try Something Different

You don’t have to buy gifts and go out for dinner for Valentine’s Day. You can do whatever you want. While you’re probably aware of that, there are two things potentially stopping you: the expectation of tradition and the absence of alternative ideas. If you talk to your significant other, however, you might be able to figure out a date you’d both enjoy that doesn’t involve the same thing that pretty much everyone else is doing. Here are some alternative ideas:

Be a Bad Valentine

The Valentine's Day Survival GuideOne of the best dates I’ve ever had involved buying a large bag of french fries and sneaking into a tall building to eat, talk, and watch the city of Boston from the sky. While this may or may not sound like something you want to do with your date, there’s one thing you should consider: mischief. Being a little bad by yourself doesn’t have the same effect as being bad with others. You don’t want to do anything that’s truly bad, but just something where you could get caught and in a little bit of trouble if you did. The rush of going through that experience together will make it more fun and memorable. It will help create a bond. If there’s ever some safe, harmless trouble you wanted to make but never did, Valentine’s Day might be a good opportunity.

Photo by Jill M.


Celebrate What You Love

The Valentine's Day Survival GuideRomance shouldn’t necessarily be born out of gifts and food. It should be about expressing love and celebrating the love you have with somebody. Sit down with your significant other and make a list of things you both really enjoy together, then make the night about those things. These things can be food and gifts, but try to think about activities you enjoy together and the reasons you love/care about each other. Find ways to celebrate those things rather than simply going the traditional route.


Try Something New

The Valentine's Day Survival GuideYour date should be about creating a positive memorable experience that you can look back on fondly, and trying something neither of you have experienced before is often a good way to accomplish this. Try not to make it something you’ve necessarily always wanted to do, but something neither of you have really considered trying before and do not have a specific attachment to in any way. The idea is for you both to experience something new together and to bond over how much you either love or hate it. If it’s truly new and you don’t really have any prior feelings about what you’re about to try, the night won’t be ruined if you find out one of you likes it or doesn’t. Even if you both hate it, you’ll have plenty to talk about afterwards. Be a little strange, pick something you’d never thought you’d do, and do it together.


Reschedule

The Valentine's Day Survival GuideIf a fancy, romantic dinner is the Valentine’s Day you want to have then you might want to consider having it on a day that isn’t quite Valentine’s Day. Restaurant reservations are difficult to find if you don’t plan fairly far in advance and, with so much restaurant traffic, you have a higher likelihood of getting screwed out of your reservation altogether. If you have your heart set on a particular restaurant, you’ll have a much easier time shifting Valentine’s Day a few days earlier or later. The day has no real personal significance to you (like, say, your birthday), so try not to get hung up on it. Of course, many people have a traditional dinner and a nice evening despite the hassle it sometimes brings, but if you want to avoid a potential mess just reschedule for a different day.

Prepare for Disaster

Sometimes there is nothing you can do to prevent disaster, so you have to prepare for it. Often times being able to quickly solve a problem can lead to something unexpectedly better. You may even find yourself feeling glad something went wrong because it turned out better in the end. Here are some suggestions:

  • Have a Backup Plan – If you’ve got a very specific evening planned out, consider how it might go wrong and what you can do about it. If you have a backup plan ready when/if your primary plan is met with failure, you can continue the night smoothly without too much hassle. This may mean making an extra reservation, picking a backup restaurant you know won’t have a wait, thinking of two activities or places with emotional significance in case one doesn’t work out, and even planning an alternative night at home should going out just turn into a huge disaster on its own.
  • Use Your Smartphone – While you probably don’t want to take out the smartphone if you don’t have to, it can provide you with easy access to information about entertainment, restaurants, and other activities near you should something go wrong. Have a page or folder dedicated to Valentine’s Day emergency apps so you can spring into action the moment disaster strikes.
  • Anticipate Delays and Unexpected Problems – If you’re going out, you need to leave early. How early? That’s something you can plan for by checking your local traffic on Google Maps and looking for advisories on your local department of transportation web site. You can also check local event sites (or even local pages on Yelp and City Search) to see what’s going on near the area you’ll be so you can find a place to park your car (if you’re driving). Figure out what could go wrong and account for enough time to endure it. You probably won’t be able to avoid the inevitable traffic of vehicles and people, but you can at least figure out how much it’s going to affect your night.

Singles

If you’re single, Valentine’s Day can seem especially obnoxious. Nonetheless, it doesn’t mean you can’t have a good time. Here are some tips for spending it alone and with other single friends so you can stave off loneliness and don’t have to miss out on the party.

Make It Your Day

We’ve talked about how many little things make you happier than a few big ones, and you have no better day than Valentine’s Day to put that into practice. If you’re alone this Valentine’s Day, break out all your favorite things. Plan out a night where you get to do all the things you love to do that don’t require other people. Grab your favorite foods, enjoy your favorite books, TV, movies, and games, make something you’ve always wanted to make, and just do what you want to do. Being alone is not a bad thing and it can be pretty great if you learn to embrace it. You just need to think of things that you like to do and learn to be happy when you’re by yourself. Just because you’re not with someone on Valentine’s Day doesn’t mean the holiday has to be horrible and sad. Some years you’ll be with someone and some years you won’t. That’s how it works, and every one of those years can be fun if you allow it.


Be Somebody’s Entertainment

The Valentine's Day Survival GuideIf you can’t go out and enjoy some entertainment yourself, just be entertainment for somebody else. One year, despite having a date, I performed in a Valentine’s Day concert. Sadly for my date, it was the highlight of the evening. What you do isn’t as important as the joy you get from doing it. Figure out something you love to do and then go out and do it somewhere that you’ll be appreciated. For most, Valentine’s Day is about feeling appreciated. When you get that feeling from a group of people, it’s pretty great. If you think you don’t have the requisite talent to go perform for any kind of audience, formally or not, you can always participate in the free hugs campaign, do a little volunteer work, or do something for others in another more traditional way.


Organize a V-Day Group Outing

The Valentine's Day Survival GuideSome people have a tradition of spending Valentine’s Day with their other single friends. This is a great way to still go out and have a good time, but isn’t an option for everyone. Assuming you do have friends, or at least some acquaintances, you’re not out of luck if there’s no platonic date available for you. Even if it’s a bit last-minute, invite as many people as you can to a Valentine’s Day outing for singles. Don’t just invite friends you know well and like, but invite people you still need to get to know. The worst-case scenario is that they’ll think it’s stupid and decide not to come. On the other hand, you might make a few lonely people very happy to have something to do. It’s a good opportunity to make new friends out of your acquaintances, and you might even end up meeting your date for Valentine’s Day 2012.


Everybody

You don’t want to forget about your family and friends regardless of whether or not you’re in a relationship. Contact the people you care about to say hi. Let them know you care. You don’t have to do this under the pretense of Valentine’s Day, but it’s a good excuse to remind people that they matter to you. You never know when someone’s going to need that reminder, but there’s rarely a bad time.

For the Lonely Valentines

If you’re convinced your Valentine’s Day is going to suck, send us an email at tips@lifehacker.com with the subject Lonely Valentine. Include a sentence or two about yourself and/or your situation. We’ll record a personalized V-Day message for as many people as we can. If you’re not so lonely and want to help us out by recording a message for someone else, send us an email at the same address and with the same subject line to let us know.


You can contact Adam Dachis, the author of this post, at adachis@lifehacker.com. You can also follow him on Twitter and Facebook.
 

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/vip/~3/bOx-mb0tOPs/

Helen Hunt Hilary Duff Hilary Swank Isaiah Washington

How to Create Homemade, Eco-Friendly Glass Cleaner on the Cheap [Cleaning]

Monday, February 14th, 2011

How to Create Homemade, Eco-Friendly Glass Cleaner on the CheapGlass cleaner is a really effective, often multi-purpose cleaner, but sometimes your run out, want to save some money, or prefer an eco-friendly version. Here’s how you can make your own homemade glass cleaner on the cheap.

Your homemade window cleaner consists of equal parts of the following things you probably already have at home:

  • Vinegar
  • Water
  • Isopropyl alchohol

eHow recommends one cup of each to fill a spray bottle, but so long as you use the same amount of everything you should be fine with any measurement.

How to Create Homemade, Eco-Friendly Glass Cleaner on the Cheap How to make Ecofriendly Natural Windex | eHow


You can contact Adam Dachis, the author of this post, at adachis@lifehacker.com. You can also follow him on Twitter and Facebook.
 

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/vip/~3/ASwZK7sj24A/

Bridgette Wilson Britney Spears Brittany Murphy Brittany Snow

These Are the Last Words I Have to Say; That’s Why This Took So Long to Write [Announcements]

Monday, February 14th, 2011

These Are the Last Words I Have to Say; That's Why This Took So Long to WriteToday’s my last day at Lifehacker. Indulge me for a moment as I reflect on working for Lifehacker and bid you all a fond farewell.

Normally this time of day on a Sunday you’d see a featured workspace. This time around it’ll be some reflections and a dash of advice. Here’s a look back at my years at Lifehacker and a distillation of all my lifehacking advice into a final closing note.

Getting Started and Google-Fu for the Dalai Lama

It all started almost four years ago when Lifehacker put out a call for their first ever intern. At the time I was working a crazy schedule but figured, what the hell? I was already reading Lifehacker so why not make a little money helping out, right? Here are some choice quotes from my intern application:

My house is networked, my xbox modded, my backups automated, my task lighting subdued and swanky, my google-fu astounds the Dalai Lama, and I dream in assembly code. [...]

I also swear by Odin’s beard to blow all my meager intern pay on funding the Pirate/Ninja Olympics in Serbia. Seriously.

These Are the Last Words I Have to Say; That's Why This Took So Long to WriteMy house is still networked, my xboxes still modded (and many of them replaced with nettop XBMC units), my task lighting subdued and swanky, and my Google-fu still astounds the Dalai Lama (he’s always emailing me asking me to help him find new ways to troll China). I’ve kept swearing by Odin’s beard and I did blow a lot of my intern pay on the Pirate/Ninja Olympics—it turns out there aren’t that many pirates and ninjas around and their predisposition for slaying their enemies really made the whole thing a one-off event, alas. Photo by pseudoxx.

Between then and now I kept plugging along, researching articles and then writing them, slowly writing more and more. It’s roughly 4,500 articles later and I’ve finally learned the most valuable lesson one can learn when studying and writing about lifehacking: you have to take your own advice.

Time to Deploy Operation Ultimate Lifehack

These Are the Last Words I Have to Say; That's Why This Took So Long to WriteI’ve written guides for all of you about slowing down, making more time for your personal life, balancing your work loads, getting enough sleep, and otherwise improving your lives.

Many of those guides I wrote while hardly sleeping, juggling being a dad, husband, teacher, student, writer, and more all at one time. I was falling prey to the fate of good advice givers; I dolled out awesome tips but I was burning the candle too fast to apply them to my own life. Photo by nattu.

Now it’s time to start living the life I’ve been telling you all to live and clean out my desk at Lifehacker. I’m not leaving because I don’t love Lifehacker. I’ve loved sharing my ideas with millions of people. I’ve loved appearing on radio shows across the world to share those ideas with millions more. I’ve given speeches about lifehacking, answered questions about lifehacking from readers from Berkeley to Beijing, and been a part of the lives of millions who wanted to find a way to use their computers more efficiently, plan their days more effectively, and ultimately have more time to do the things they love. I’m leaving because it’s time to take my own advice, scale back, and spend more time with my family.

Thank You for Being a Friend*

Before I leave, I need to dole out a mountain of thanks.

First, I thank you the readership of Lifehacker. All my writing, hacking, screenshot taking, warranty voiding, and inquiry would have been much less satisfying without all of you to read and critique the things I created. Of all the BBSes, web sites, forums, and more I’ve frequented over the years you’ve proven to be some of the most civil and insightful internet citizens I’ve had the pleasure of encountering. You’ve sent me your tips, your photos, your questions, and your good will. Thank you.

Second, I thank the staff at Lifehacker including one in emeritus, Gina Trapani—I will forever have a soft spot for her and her early tutelage and guidance in the art of blogging. I’ve logged a lot of hours here—chatting with Kevin and Whitson in the early hours as we waited for the West coast crew to rise and join us, hashing out ideas with everyone in our weekly meetings and daily emails, passing down my alpha-intern tips to the new interns—and you’ve all made them fun. I’ll miss the action of working for a publication that runs the press hot and serves up interesting articles to millions daily. Thank you guys for making it a great experience.

(*Is there any situation in which quoting the theme song to the Golden Girls is inappropriate? I think not.)

On Forwarding Addresses and Ever Afters

These Are the Last Words I Have to Say; That's Why This Took So Long to WriteWhere to now? I’m not vanishing, just making time to live a little. You can always keep up with me at JasonFitzpatrick.com the nexus of all my random Facebook updates, Twittering, and article writing. You can also find me over at How-To Geek answering questions and doling out weekly doses of geek history. If you thought the posts I wrote here (the weekend ones especially) were random and fun you should really follow me and my antics to see all the random stuff I dredge up in a week. The internet is an infinite playground for someone with my eclectic and geekish tastes.

Finally, it’s time for me to share my last bit of advice for the Lifehacker readership before I go.

The only commodity we have is time. Somewhere—in your mind, on a notepad, stashed in a virtual notebook—you have a list of things you’d like to be doing with your time before it all slips away. Do what you have to do to take those ideas out of storage and make them happen. You can trade and barter for a lot in life but you can never buy back time. Go live.

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/vip/~3/SXnKLjQCn6o/

Colleen Haskell Constance Marie Courteney Cox Dakota Fanning

Archive Gallery: PopSci Fights the Battle of the Sexes

Monday, February 14th, 2011
July 1928
PopSci attempts to determine, once and for all, which is the superior gender

Over the years, Popular Science has strived to answer your questions about the world we live in. What’s on the moon? Why don’t we have flying cars? How do magnets work? As compelling and relevant as these questions are, though, none inspires as much fury as the age-old debate on whether men and women are equally capable.

For the most part, we answered no. Like it or not, our magazine has always been a product of its time, and for at least the first 70 years of our 138-year history, we held men in higher esteem because science and feminist literature had not yet given us reason to believe that women could accomplish much on a grand scale.

Click to launch the photo gallery.

While the battle of the sexes began thousands of years ago, we began paying extra attention to it in 1920, when women won the right to vote. Women began to matter, and as a male-dominated publication, we weren’t sure we approved. We balked women female athletes either broke, or came close to breaking records held by men. We scoffed at women who thought they could drive without getting into an accident. “Men, it seems, are able to beat women in sports just because they are men, endowed by nature with superior qualities of speed, strength, and stamina!” we wrote after arguing why women’s sports were a farce.

Still, we couldn’t deny the psychology reports demonstrating that male and female students scored equally on intelligence tests. We couldn’t deny that the male and female brains donated to science bore the same weight and measurements. A few of our writers conceded, saying that men and women were separate but equal. Their intelligence and temperaments complemented each other.

But this is the pre-Betty Friedan era we’re talking about. Calling women equals in the mid-1920s might have been a step forward, but later that decade, we took two steps back after publishing Dr. Prescott Lecky’s article on why women can never achieve greatness.

“Women do not count large among the geniuses because they do not want to be geniuses,” he wrote. “They want to be women.”

Offended? Amused? Or (lord help you) inspired? Click through our gallery to read more about the early 20th century’s attitude toward female intelligence, athletic ability and driving skills.

Source: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-02/archive-gallery-popsci-settles-battle-sexes

Thora Birch Tiffani Amber Thiessen Tim Allen Tina Fey

Hack an Air Freshener into an Remote Camera Trigger [DIY]

Monday, February 14th, 2011

Hack an Air Freshener into an Remote Camera TriggerAutomatic air fresheners practically beg to be hacked apart thanks to the servo motors and timers inside. One photography enthusiast demonstrates how to hack apart a Glade air freshener to build a remote camera trigger.

Tinkerer JCoPro pulled apart a Glade automatic air freshener to see what was inside. Once he gutted it he realized the mechanism inside could easily be repurposed as a remote camera trigger. A little hacking and a plywood bracket later, and he had a functional prototype. Hit up the link below for instructions, photos, and videos.

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/vip/~3/8DDg2iHwrfg/

Jude Law Jules Asner Julia Roberts Julia Stiles

Avoid Telemarketers by Understanding Their Secrets [Annoyances]

Monday, February 14th, 2011

Avoid Telemarketers by Understanding Their SecretsSure, you can put yourself on the Do Not Call list but that doesn’t stop telemarketers from being able to call you. With tons of loopholes, there’s barely a solution. Here’s a look at telemarketing strategy and what you can do to beat it.

Photo by Mike Licht

An anonymous telemarketer wrote into the Consumerist to explain how and why telemarketing works:

Our contact rate when we call is less than 10%, our email rate is almost 0, and our mailing rate is less than 5%. Phone call is the most effective and cheapest. Email is ineffective but it’s free. Mailing is costly but also ineffective. That is why we do all of our sales on the phone and why getting a person on the phone is so critical to our sales process.

The telemarketer continues to explain that you can be called, legally, for up to 90 days after requesting a quote even if you’re on the National Do Not Call List. They’ll often promise deals that sound a lot better than they are to get you to stay on the call. The best way to avoid these calls is to make them unsuccessful. Do not agree to listen to anything. Be clear that the only time you want to hear about this information is if you call yourself. If worse comes to worst, you can always start blocking numbers from calling you.

For more great tips and interesting secrets of telemarketing, hit up the full post over at the Consumerist.

10 Confessions Of An Insurance Telemarketer | The Consumerist


You can contact Adam Dachis, the author of this post, at adachis@lifehacker.com. You can also follow him on Twitter and Facebook.
 

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/vip/~3/_Fh8U6UfQgE/

Sandra Bullock Sandra Oh Sara Paxton Sara Ramirez

Citizens Push To Erect A Statue of RoboCop in Detroit

Monday, February 14th, 2011
RoboCop via Kickstarter

If the RoboCop saga has any lasting lessons, maybe it’s that politicians shouldn’t mess around with Twitter.

What started out as a joke on the social media site has mushroomed into a nationwide effort to build a statue of RoboCop in the beleaguered city of Detroit. Earlier this week, someone in Massachusetts sent a tweet to Detroit Mayor Dave Bing, suggesting RoboCop would be a great mascot for the city. Philadelphia has a Rocky statue, and RoboCop would “kick Rocky’s butt,” he pointed out.

Bing actually wrote back, responding, “There are not any plans to erect a statue to Robocop. Thank you for the suggestion.”

The Internet was listening. Not long after Bing’s tweet, a group of Detroit residents started a Facebook event page, which quickly grew to 4,600 supporters and counting. As of Friday morning, supporters have already raised $8,300 toward their $50,000 goal, using the fundraising platform Kickstarter.

Imagination Station, a nonprofit center aimed at cleaning up blighted neighborhoods, is offering space on its campus for the RoboCop statue. The Kickstarter campaign explains how metal artists might build the statue: “We can take a relatively small figure of RoboCop (conceivably even an action figure), have it 3D scanned by lasers (cool!) and scale its form to create a light-weight model of any size we’d like, which can then be used to pour and cast liquid metal.”

While Bing rejected the idea of a city-funded effort, his office seemed willing to accept RoboCop, in case his likeness is bestowed upon them.

“Should the opportunity present itself to receive a donation of this, or any other works of public art, we will consider acceptance and appropriate placement,” said Karen Dumas, a spokeswoman for the mayor’s office.

The Detroit Free Press points out that not everyone loves the idea: “Sorry, I think this idea is horrid,” Carl Henry of Plymouth posted on the Facebook page. “If you wanna build a statue, build one to represent an unemployed autoworker, homeless person or something deserving of recognition.”

Others have argued statues of Motown legends like Diana Ross or Michael Jackson should take precedent over a nerd-tastic sci-fi icon.

The fundraising campaign has until March 26 to reach its goal.

[via Reuters]

Source: http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-02/twitter-joke-sparks-real-effort-erect-statue-robocop-detroit

Sandra Bullock Sandra Oh Sara Paxton Sara Ramirez

Archive Gallery: PopSci Fights the Battle of the Sexes

Sunday, February 13th, 2011
July 1928
PopSci attempts to determine, once and for all, which is the superior gender

Over the years, Popular Science has strived to answer your questions about the world we live in. What’s on the moon? Why don’t we have flying cars? How do magnets work? As compelling and relevant as these questions are, though, none inspires as much fury as the age-old debate on whether men and women are equally capable.

For the most part, we answered no. Like it or not, our magazine has always been a product of its time, and for at least the first 70 years of our 138-year history, we held men in higher esteem because science and feminist literature had not yet given us reason to believe that women could accomplish much on a grand scale.

Click to launch the photo gallery.

While the battle of the sexes began thousands of years ago, we began paying extra attention to it in 1920, when women won the right to vote. Women began to matter, and as a male-dominated publication, we weren’t sure we approved. We balked women female athletes either broke, or came close to breaking records held by men. We scoffed at women who thought they could drive without getting into an accident. “Men, it seems, are able to beat women in sports just because they are men, endowed by nature with superior qualities of speed, strength, and stamina!” we wrote after arguing why women’s sports were a farce.

Still, we couldn’t deny the psychology reports demonstrating that male and female students scored equally on intelligence tests. We couldn’t deny that the male and female brains donated to science bore the same weight and measurements. A few of our writers conceded, saying that men and women were separate but equal. Their intelligence and temperaments complemented each other.

But this is the pre-Betty Friedan era we’re talking about. Calling women equals in the mid-1920s might have been a step forward, but later that decade, we took two steps back after publishing Dr. Prescott Lecky’s article on why women can never achieve greatness.

“Women do not count large among the geniuses because they do not want to be geniuses,” he wrote. “They want to be women.”

Offended? Amused? Or (lord help you) inspired? Click through our gallery to read more about the early 20th century’s attitude toward female intelligence, athletic ability and driving skills.

Source: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-02/archive-gallery-popsci-settles-battle-sexes

Anna Kournikova Arielle Kebbel Ashlee Simpson Ashley Judd

Minimalist for Google Calendar Tweaks Google Calendar to Your Liking [Downloads]

Sunday, February 13th, 2011

Minimalist for Google Calendar Tweaks Google Calendar to Your LikingChrome: We love tweaking Gmail to our liking with extensions like Minimalist Gmail, but if you’ve wanted to do the same to Google Calendar, Minimalist for Google Calendar will let you remove links, tweak buttons, and change the colors of your Calendar.

Minimalist for Google Calendar is very similar to its Gmail-based brother: it lets you tweak all sorts of different interface elements of Google Calendar so it fits what you need. Don’t need the “other calendars” box? Remove it. Want a link to Google Voice at the top instead of to Google Docs? You can change it. You can also change the color of nearly any part of the page, as well as even remove things like the mini calendar and logo to make it more friendly to netbook screens. There are a lot of settings buried in this extension, so if you’re a Google Calendar user, check this extension out—you’ll probably find a few things in there you want enabled.

Minimalist for Google Calendar is a free download, works wherever Google Chrome does.

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/vip/~3/6YScWDHEbWA/

Victoria Beckham Vin Diesel Virginia Madsen Will Smith

Tie Your Shoes Faster with the Ian Knot [Video]

Sunday, February 13th, 2011

We’ve shown you a few ways to tie your shoes more efficiently, but if you’re looking for a super-speedy way to get your shoes on and out the door, the Ian Knot is a super-fast method that will make it happen.

We’ve actually mentioned the Ian Knot once before, but the diagrams were a bit difficult to follow for some, so reader A Jostel put together the above video, complete with a slowed-down demonstration and instructions, for super simple learning (he also included a nice trick to getting the first half of the knot down). It might take a few minutes to get right, but once you get used to it, you’ll be tying your shoes in two seconds flat.

Source: http://lifehacker.com/#!5757932/tie-your-shoes-faster-with-the-ian-knot

Minka Kelly Mischa Barton Missy Peregrym Molly Sims